The Leafie web site within the UK reviews..

A Harley Street doctor working at a non-public follow specialising in hashish primarily based therapies has defended his conduct, after being accused of placing ‘children at risk of harm’ by prescribing CBD to epilepsy sufferers as young as 17 months, reviews The Times.  

Dr Nathan Hasson, 61, a pediatric rheumatologist on the Medical Cannabis Clinic in Harley Street, is suspected of performing past his area of proficiency by administering hashish primarily based therapies to young children with out holding the required {qualifications}, and with out consulting with colleagues who do have the mandatory expertises. Dr Hasson has willingly supplied not to prescribe any extra hashish primarily based medicines to sufferers for the following 18 months whereas the GMC carries out its investigation. 

In papers seen by The Times, it was revealed {that a} formal grievance was lodged in opposition to Dr Hasson by the British Paediatric Neurology Association due to their issues that he prescribed a hashish primarily based medication, particularly one which comprises the psychoactive cannabinoid THC, to children with epilepsy with out consulting neurologists already caring for these sufferers. The grievance highlighted a 17 month-old affected person with a uncommon neurological dysfunction known as Landau-Kleffner syndrome, the place it was questioned if hashish primarily based medication was appropriately and essentially prescribed. 

Professor Finbar O’Callaghan, president of the British Paediatric Neurology Association mentioned, “Dr Hasson was potentially putting children at risk of harm with the way he practises outside his area of expertise and without consultation with the specialist doctors looking after these complex children.”

Dr Hasson mentioned in an announcement, “I had already stopped seeing new patients due to an overwhelming caseload before the matter was brought by the GMC. I am fully trained and legally allowed to prescribe cannabis products for children, as agreed by the Nice guidance on this. This was not questioned by the tribunal.”


Source link