By BYRON NELSON JR., Hoopa Valley Tribal Chairman
In response to the op-ed written by Lyle Marshall, Hoopa Tribal Citizen, printed within the Two Rivers Tribune’s Opinions Section on November 24, 2020, inaccurate allegations had been made which are deceptive and outright unfaithful. The subject of Cannabis and the legality of possession, rising, and distribution throughout the Reservation have been an ongoing dialogue which have far reaching results, each inside our group, and a broader federal regulation system that has distinctive jurisdiction over the Tribe. It has been a heated dialog with divided opinion, dialogue, and confusion over laws addressing Title 34, of the Hoopa Tribal Code, banning the cultivation of hashish throughout the Hoopa Reservation boundaries.
On June 19, 2018, a referendum was handed by the Hoopa Tribal Membership addressing Title 34 and whether or not or not rising hashish is a authorized or unlawful act throughout the boundaries of the Reservation. Clarification of this Referendum ought to be introduced to the Hoopa Tribal Court to get hold of a judicial opinion to discern the language and which means of the Referendum as confusion in regards to the language that was introduced on the poll and what it had really supposed has been a subject for dialogue for a while.
We all, for essentially the most half, can agree the advantages of hashish…