An inside doc from the U.S. Department of Justice’s misconduct workplace discovered nothing improper with Attorney General William Barr’s choice ordering antitrust prosecutors to evaluate 10 proposed marijuana enterprise mergers.
Politico reported the company’s Office of Professional Conduct discovered that it was “reasonable” for the DOJ’s antitrust division to “seek additional information from the industry through its Second Request process,” based on a memo from the workplace.
The memo was written in response to a pair of whistleblower complaints from inside the DOJ’s antitrust division, which had alleged that the evaluations violated federal regulation by “conducting pretextual investigations” of MJ business mergers.
On Wednesday, a profession prosecutor from the DOJ, John Elias, testified to the House Judiciary Committee that Barr had ordered the 10 investigations as a result of he was prejudiced towards the hashish business, including that the strikes had been tantamount to “harassment.”
Elias additionally advised lawmakers he had seen the memo defending the investigations, and that he disagreed with its conclusions, Politico reported.
“If your sole motivation is animosity, that is impermissible. If there is no rule or regulation, there is one missing because that’s obviously wrong,” Elias mentioned.